Short Title: Where the Hell is Matt Director: Matthew Harding
One of our hopes here at rednoW is simply to point people to a variety of experiences in wonder. The more we tackle this oh-so-mysterious topic, the more we discover its unpredictability. It tends to show up in a variety of mediums: intrigue, beauty, the transcendent, humanity, and the absurd (to name a few). There is no fancy formula. It just happens. And to be honest, I did not expect it show up within the following video...
Title: I Remember (It's Happening Again) Artist: Griffin House
Welcome to the season of elections, where things are black and white (or should I say blue and red), good and evil, and there is no in between. This has become tiresome to many Americans, as evidenced by the last midterm election where Democrats took control of Congress. Now, both candidates in the upcoming presidential race seem much more centered and less willing to polarize than past candidates. This is also evidenced by how Craig Detweiler and John Marks' film "Purple State of Mind ," about the political and religious divide in our country, seems to resonate with so many people (Click here for trailer).
There is a call for a dialogue between the poles. Or, at least for people to admit that there is ground in the middle and how complicated standing on that ground can be. When the war in Iraq began I remember my grandfather, a navy veteran of WWII, telling me how much it pained him to see young men and woman going off to war. At the time I was in college. Everywhere I turned, all I saw were those who opposed the military and the war, and those in favor of the military and for the war. But my grandfather's reaction was much more nuanced. It was refreshing to me, as I lived in a world of polarized opinions.
Title: The Dark Knight Director: Christopher Nolan
With The Dark Knight's claims to box-office pre-eminence secured, the spin cycle begins. What does this hugely popular, amazingly resonate movie mean? What is the message amidst all the madness cruising through Gotham's streets? At HollywoodJesus.com, The Joker is associated with postmodernism and all things relative, making Batman the force for moral absolutes. At Dirty Harry's Place, Batman emerges as a surrogate George W. Bush, willing to be hated for the sake of a larger mission. Yet, at Beliefnet.com, The Dark Knight is traced back to St. John of the Cross and his dark nights of the soul. Is this the sign of a great movie or merely a conflicted audience? How many readings are possible? How many readings are helpful? What might be the filmmakers' intent?
The Dark Knight is all about choices. Christopher and Jonathan Nolan embed this comic book universe with the contemporary question: how should we respond to terrorism? Will we suspend civil rights for the sake of order? What are the limits of interrogation? The Joker pushes Bruce Wayne to the brink of his moral code. Batman breaks ankles to obtain information. Do ethics hinder our effectiveness in fighting crime? The Joker is frighteningly free, dangerously untethered. He makes law and order attractive. Yet, he also points out how easily we adapt or rewrite our rules. What happens when our plans are derailed? Do we paint ourselves as heroes to rationalize carefully crafted schemes? The Joker exposes our tendency to justify our actions irrespective of the law. How much difference is there between a mobster, a corrupt cop or an accountant who fudges the books? Don't vigilante break laws, too? This is about how the world (doesn't) work.
As "post-modern" has become a dirty word and a threat to all morality, the term "meta-narrative" has ventured out of narrative theory circles and has seen an increase in popular usage. People outside of literary circles have come to see narrative theory as important (whether they know it or not) not just for discussions of Charles Dickens' novels, but as important for how we view our own stories and see our own lives.
In hanging out with young people (mostly college and high school age), I've been able to look on as they attempt to fit into and/or create their own meta-narrative. Take a look at almost any of college or high schooler's facebook profile and you will notice the variety, and seeming disjunction, in the quote section. This seems to be a pretty good picture of how we go about creating ourselves from the number of narratives that we're bombarded with everyday and that from outside might seem irreconcilable.
A friend recently sent me a link to a YouTube video knowing that I might dig it. He was right. I have watched it several times transfixed by the combination of the opening monologue, “holy crap” footage and hauntingly beautiful UNKLE remix of the Moby song God Moving Over The Face Of The Water.
I am realizing that I have a predilection for what arises when multiple separate pieces are brought together to form a new whole. It creates a symphony of beauty that helps draw out a deeper truth. But I wonder if some feel this is a form of manipulation or an over stepping of creative bounds.
Title: Encounters at the End of the World Director: Werner Herzog
When Werner Herzog received an invitation from the National Science Foundation to visit its Antarctic headquarters, he made it clear that he was in no mood to make another film about "fuzzy penguins". The line is a funny, if unsurprising, way to begin Encounters at the End of the World. Despite the recurring theme of global warming as the coming apocalypse (the film’s title works on multiple levels), Herzog’s dry wit keeps the audience engaged, and even laughing at times.
I've been thinking about freedom lately, and what it means to be free. Brooke and I have talked about this some and we've discussed what society means when it uses the word "freedom." For example, we were watching the movie Definitely, Maybe last night and there was a quick line about freedom. Being a romantic comedy, of course this line was about marriage taking your freedom: when you get married, you give up your freedom.
In one sense this is true. Being married means that I can't (or don't) make brash decisions. I don't decide at the last minute to leave for the weekend on a hiking trip; I don't blast music when Brooke is trying to sleep; I spend money a little differently -- more goes to a house and to clothes than it did when I was single.
But honestly, these are pretty shallow freedoms. Basically, being married means that I don't always act on my first impulse all the time -- like if I want to go camping I ask Brooke what works for her, rather than packing the car. Either way, I still get to go camping. If I think we should spend our money differently, we talk about it. But, for anyone who knows me, you know that I already have more access to money being married to Brooke than I ever did on my own, and it's good to take care of the house and wear clothes that don't make you look like you're homeless. I still get time alone, I still get time with friends, I'm going back to school with the help of my wife (another thing much harder to do on my own) -- I have trouble thinking of any real freedom that I have given up by marrying Brooke.
On the other hand, I've gained freedom. Sure, I may wait another weekend to go camping, but I have gained unconditional love and relationship. Brooke and I were talking last night about how simply being in a relationship of unconditional love, it has freed us from insecurities and fears. I'm not as self-conscious as I used to be: I'm now loved unconditionally. I can completely be at ease and myself with this person. Even more, in some way I am more of myself than I was when I was single: I have someone to laugh with, to challenge me, to encourage and support me, to simply be with me. All of those things help me become more of who I really am. Brooke doing this to me, and me being able to laugh with, challenge, encourage and support her are incredibly freeing actions.
Just some thoughts on freedom today -- and what freedom really means. Not everyone needs marriage to find this freedom, but I do believe everyone needs to find unconditional love to find greater freedom. Everyone needs to be in a relationship of unconditional love. Because more than simply listening to the latest impulse, unconditional love loosens the chains of self-doubt and self-consciousness to allow me to be who I really am. And that is freedom at its deepest.
Title: The Robots In My Bedroom Were Playing Arena Rock Artist: Softlightes Director: Ron Fountenberry (also the lead singer)
Say no! to being cool. Say yes to being happy. It sounds like a pretty good plan, or like a pretty good album title. In fact it's the title of the latest album from Softlightes, which is the home of one of my top songs from the past three months: "The Robots in My Bedroom Were Playing Arena Rock." Although I've been listening to the song for a while now, I hadn't seen the video until recently. It's a pretty basic video, but I think the absurdity of the song, the frivolousness of the title, and the cool-refusing ethos all work to live up to the title of the album.
if anyone remembers pigman shouting “pins and needles, pins and needles” in the “great” film PCU back in the 90’s, you may remember it was because he found a movie that had both michael caine and gene hackman in it. it was the conclusion to his college thesis [i’m not going to explain how…just watch the old filthy movie yourself if you care.] i mention this because i had a “pins and needles” moment myself last night. here on my computer i found the molding together of two great forces.